Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/20/1993

State v. Diaz

Citations

226 Conn. 514
628 A.2d 567
1993 Conn. LEXIS 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting defendant’s claim that article first, § 7 required de novo review of the probable cause determination made by a judge issuing a warrant, in part because of its concern that such review would discourage the police from seeking warrants
“[i]n effect, [the sixth Geisler] factor directs our attention to considerations of public policy”
“[i]n effect, [the sixth Geisler] factor directs our attention to considerations of public policy”
neither Connecticut constitution nor General Statutes § 52-33f requires de novo review of issuing judge’s determination that probable cause existed to issue search warrant
neither Connecticut constitution nor General Statutes § 52-33f requires de novo review of issuing judge’s determination that probable cause existed to issue search warrant
whether particular inference drawn by fact finder is reasonable is legal determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon, Borden, Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

111 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.