Cook v. State
Citations
- 46 Fla. 20
Syllabus
<p>1. The defendant propounded the following question to a witness: “While you and Brooks and Cook were on the railroad track, what remark did Cook make in regard to protecting our citizens?” This was objected to by the State Attorney, and the objection sustained, but the court stated the witness could be asked what was said in the conversation; and defendant’s attorney then asked the witness to state the whole conversation, which the witness proceeded to do. Even if the question was permissible, the court committed no reversible error.</p> <p>2. When the defense is that the defendant was so much intoxicated as to be unable to premeditate the killing, and a conversation with him is brought out by his attorney from his own witness as to his condition while walking on a railroad track at night, a short time before the killing, and also a statement that he staggered, the witness may be asked on cross-examination what was the condition of the track, whether any man was not likely to make a misstep, and whether persons other than the defendant stumble there sometimes.</p> <p>3. Where a witness produced by a party to prove his good reputation testifies that he knows such reputation, and that it is good, he may be asked on cross-examination, for the purpose of testing his credibility, if he had not heard that the party had been guilty of specific acts of bad conduct pertinent to such general reputation; but the witness can not be interrrogated as to his knowledge of such specific acts, nor can his testimony as to what he may have heard respecting specific acts be considered for any other purpose than as affecting his credibility.</p> <p>4. Where a defendant in a prosecution for murder puts his reputation and general character in evidence, and does not limit the evidence to testimony as to his being a quiet and peaceable man, the State on cross-examination, over the objection of defendant, asked the witness testifying to general, good character, if he had not heard that the
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering instruction on jury’s ability to recommend the defendant to the mercy of the court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carter, Cockreeu, Hockrr, Maxwere, Shackleford, Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McCrae v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-09· cited 101×
- Clinton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 60×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-11-13· cited 39×
- Alford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 36×
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 35×
- Fine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-11-19· cited 35×
- State v. AnselmoUtah Supreme Court· 1915-05-08· cited 35×
- Markey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 32×
- The STATE v. WorthySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-01-30· cited 29×
- State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-08-27· cited 25×
- Platt v. RowandSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 20×
- McCall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 19×
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 18×
- State v. MoormanMontana Supreme Court· 1958-01-16· cited 16×
- Vickery v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 16×
- Watkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-02-25· cited 15×
- Luke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-11-14· cited 14×
- Cliff Berry, Inc. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-04· cited 14×
- Greenfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-08-31· cited 12×
- Partlow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-04· cited 12×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- The People v. . ConroyNew York Court of Appeals· 1884-10-14· cited 90×
- People of the State of New York v. . MajoneNew York Court of Appeals· 1883-01-23· cited 50×
- Hawthorne v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1881-04-15· cited 50×
- Ozburn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1891-04-24· cited 48×
- Fahnestock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1864-11-15· cited 46×
- Binns v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1879-05-15· cited 45×
- Irvin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1883-01-15· cited 42×
- Hodge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1890-01-15· cited 39×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-01-15· cited 39×
- Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 39×
- Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-01-15· cited 33×
- Higginbotham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-06-15· cited 32×
- People v. . ConstantinoNew York Court of Appeals· 1897-05-04· cited 28×
- Olds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1902-06-15· cited 28×
- Atkinson v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1857-07-01· cited 27×
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-06-15· cited 26×
- Ernest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1883-06-15· cited 25×
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa· 1902-12-20· cited 24×
- Reddick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1889-01-15· cited 22×
- Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-06-15· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.