State v. Carter
Citations
- 21 N.M. 166
- 153 P. 271
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>' 1. Tbe general rule upon the subject of cross-examination of witnesses is that such examination can only relate to facts and circumstances connected with the matter staceu in the direct examination of the witness.</p> <p>P. 170</p> <p>2. It is recognized that from the necessity of the case the method and extent of the cross-examination must depend very largely upon the discretion of the trial judge; and this is especially true where the object is to test the accuracy and credibility of the witness.</p> <p>P. 170</p> <p>3. Por the purpose of testing the credibility of a witness; it is permissible to investigate the situation of the witness with respect to the parties and to the subject of litigation, his interest, his motives, inclinations, and prejudices, his means of obtaining a correct and certain knowledge of the facts to which he bears testimony, the manner in which he has used those means, his powers of discernment, memory, and description.</p> <p>P. 170</p> <p>4. Questions propounded to a witness on cross-examination as to what another witness had testified at a preliminary hearing in the cause was not proper cross-examination, and cannot be justified upon the theory of testing the accuracy and credibility of a witness.</p> <p>P. 171</p>
Judges: Hanna, Parker, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. StarrNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-12-31· cited 37×
- State v. McClaughertyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2003-02-04· cited 34×
- State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-08-27· cited 25×
- State v. VargasNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1937-08-16· cited 21×
- State v. BentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-12-04· cited 18×
- Wilson v. Leonard Tire Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-11-16· cited 9×
- State v. BurkettNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1927-11-09· cited 6×
- State v. SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1918-08-13· cited 5×
- Callaway v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1962-07-06· cited 3×
- State v. BentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-08-26
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.