Self v. State
Citations
- 90 Miss. 58
- 43 So. 945
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law and Procedure. Evidence, Exhibits. Experts.</p> <p>Where the condition of decedent’s skull at the time of his death was a material enquiry, the testimony of experts who did not see it until disinterred 'two years afterwards and the skull itself were inadmissible in evidence, where .it had decayed to such an extent that the witnesses could not do more than speculate touching its condition at the time in question.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- use of skull in court room improper because its condition at the time of trial was not nearly the same as its former condition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.