State v. Robinson
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2871
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by determining that the appropriate foundation was laid for State's Exhibits 8 and 9 that those exhibits were properly authenticated and thereafter admitted into evidence. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal. The defendant-appellant's aggravated-trafficking-in-drugs conviction is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 1,930×
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-20· cited 1,623×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1995-07-26· cited 1,439×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-21· cited 286×
- State v. HallerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-13· cited 264×
- State v. PattersonOhio Supreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 59×
- State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-13· cited 8×
- State v. DiSabatoOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-03· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.