· 9/3/2019

State v. DiSabato

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3542

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's Crim.R. 29(C) motion. However, because plaintiff-appellee failed to demonstrate that defendant-appellant was not prejudiced by the presence of two alternate jurors during jury deliberations, the trial court committed reversible error by failing to exclude the two alternate jurors from deliberations.

Judges: Preston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.