Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 2/21/1996

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 74 Ohio St. 3d 569
  • 660 N.E.2d 724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It should also be noted that Williams was acquitted of rape, rendering the Crim. R. 29 motion on that charge moot.”
  • challenge to trial -2- Warren CA2015-05-046 court's decision denying appellant's motion for acquittal on a charge of rape was moot where the defendant was acquitted of that charge
  • offenses in [A][7] and [A][5] death specifications are not duplicative in that case
  • and acquittal on other charges makes denial of motion moot as to that charge
  • defendant was acquitted of rape, rendering the Crim.R. 29 motion on that charge moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

148 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.