Skip to main content

State v. Wade

Citations

  • 295 Kan. 916
  • 287 P.3d 237
  • 2012 WL 5285597
  • 2012 Kan. LEXIS 496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting this standard when faced with the answer given and an answer that one of the parties deems would be a better answer, both of which would be legally appropriate
  • adopting this standard when faced with the answer given and an answer that one of the parties deems would be a better answer, both of which would be legally appropriate
  • approving “the tack of simply directing the jury’s attention back to the instructions”
  • declining to analyze identical issue as it had already been conclusively decided in Ivory
  • victim telling defendant he could not see his son not sufficient provocation for heat of passion instruction because it occurred two days before killing
  • “The hallmark of heat of passion is taking action upon impulse without reflection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.