Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/21/2000

State v. Moncla

Citations

4 P.3d 618
269 Kan. 61
2000 Kan. LEXIS 353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the \fundamental problem\ with a district court's failure to follow Rule 183 [j] is that it \impedes appellate review\
noting that \the fundamental problem with [the lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law] is that it impedes appellate review\
noting difficulty of reviewing case in which district court failed to state findings, conclusions
noting difficulty of reviewing case in which district court failed to state findings, conclusions
noting difficulty of reviewing case in which district court failed to state findings, conclusions
district court did not comply with Rule 183(j) and case remanded for findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.