Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 10/13/2022

State v. Campbell

Citations

  • 211 N.E.3d 1174
  • 170 Ohio St. 3d 278
  • 2022 Ohio 3626

Syllabus

Criminal law—Fourth Amendment—R.C. 2951.02(A)—Exclusionary rule—Community-control conditions—Probation officer's suspicionless search of probationer's cell phone did not violate Fourth Amendment when probationer had consented to warrantless searches of his property as a condition of his community control—Probation officer's suspicionless search did violate statute requiring probation officers to have reasonable grounds that probationer was violating the law or conditions of community control before conducting search—Incriminating evidence collected from cell phone not subject to exclusionary rule when search violated statute but not Fourth Amendment—Court of appeals' judgment reversed.

Judges: DeWine, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.