Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ohio Supreme Court· 1/10/1990

State v. Brewer

Citations

  • 48 Ohio St. 3d 50
  • 549 N.E.2d 491
  • 1990 Ohio LEXIS 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a defendant must attempt to reconstruct the substance of unrecorded remarks under Appellate Rule 9(C) or (E) to establish their importance
  • “finding] nothing improper in the ‘length, intensity, and frequency’ of the questioning” when there was no evidence of deprivation or mistreatment and “the actual interview took up only about three hours”
  • “find[ing] nothing improper in the ‘length, intensity, and frequency’ of the questioning” when there was no evidence of deprivation or mistreatment and “the actual interview took up only about three hours”
  • rejecting presumption of prejudice from unrecorded sidebar conferences and recognizing that, in the absence of an attempt to reconstruct the substance of the remarks and demonstrate prejudice, the error may be considered waived
  • rejecting presumption of prejudice from unrecorded sidebar conferences and recognizing that, in the absence of an attempt to reconstruct the substance of the remarks and demonstrate prejudice, the error may be considered waived
  • affirming the denial of defendant's motion to suppress when a statement was made one day after defendant was advised of his Miranda rights by a different police department

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.