Skip to main content

Younie v. State

Citations

  • 322 A.2d 211
  • 272 Md. 233
  • 1974 Md. LEXIS 776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that no penalty shall flow from the exercise of one's right to remain silent
  • stating that no penalty shall flow from the exercise of one’s right to remain silent
  • stating that no penalty shall flow from the exercise of one's right to remain silent
  • stating that no penalty shall flow from the exercise of one’s right to remain silent
  • concluding \[s]ilence in the context of a custodial inquisition is presumed to be an exercise of the privilege against self-incrimination from which no legal penalty can flow[.]\
  • dealing primarily with the constitutional aspects of the matter, although recognizing the general rule of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Digges, Eldridge, Levine, Murphy, O'Donnell, Singley, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Younie v. State

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.