Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/1/1977
State v. Carr
Citations
- 172 Conn. 458
- 374 A.2d 1107
- 1977 Conn. LEXIS 916
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denial of affirmative request for allocution not violative of either state law or federal due process
- purposes of allocution satisfied where defendant \was represented by experienced counsel throughout the proceedings who was apparently quite thorough in advancing arguments for the defendant at the time of sentencing\
- no deprivation of due process for state to deny defendant's affirmative request for allocution
- construing § 53a-147 as not requiring specific intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: House, Loiselle, Bogdanski, Longo, Barber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court· 1994-05-09· cited 598×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-28· cited 498×
- Harvey Lee Green, Jr. v. James B. French, Warden, Central PrisonFourth Circuit· 1998-05-13· cited 267×
- State v. WhistnantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-02-12· cited 230×
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-12-28· cited 228×
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-06-19· cited 212×
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-10-02· cited 199×
- Gary Stewart Boardman v. Wayne Estelle, WardenNinth Circuit· 1992-03-11· cited 129×
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-14· cited 127×
- State v. GoldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-15· cited 118×
- State v. YoungUtah Supreme Court· 1993-03-17· cited 103×
- State v. OnofrioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-09-04· cited 97×
- State v. GethersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-03· cited 82×
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-12-18· cited 81×
- State v. FalconeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-09· cited 81×
- State v. BovaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-03-18· cited 80×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-07-20· cited 73×
- State v. MejiaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-05-23· cited 69×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-01· cited 68×
- State v. PounceySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-22· cited 66×
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 2,416×
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,808×
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 1,587×
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1961-11-13· cited 1,308×
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 1,077×
- White v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 1,066×
- Textile Workers Union v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court· 1973-10-23· cited 355×
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-04-05· cited 159×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-05-03· cited 144×
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-06-09· cited 144×
- People v. LindenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-04-22· cited 134×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-12-09· cited 134×
- State v. RuizSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-07-06· cited 123×
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1880-03-15· cited 101×
- Raymond Patriarca v. United States of America, Ronald J. Cassesso v. United States of America, Henry Tameleo v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1969-01-20· cited 95×
- State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-12-31· cited 94×
- Percy Detoro v. Vernon L. Pepersack, Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryFourth Circuit· 1964-04-15· cited 85×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.