State v. Rickard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying those provisions as safeguarding the offender’s right to be personally present and to be heard at sentencing, including resentencing proceedings that involve substantive modifications of the defendant’s original sentence
• a defendant’s Article I, section 11, right to be heard “by himself’ vindicates “the right of allo-cution, by which the defendant may present mitigating circumstances to the sentencing court in the hope of receiving leniency”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Verizon New Jersey Inc. v. Hopewell Borough
  New Jersey Tax Court· 2012-06-26· cited 8×
• State v. Adair
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-07· cited 3×
• State v. Juarez-Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-07-17· cited 2×
• State v. Wilcher
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-14

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Isom
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 79×
• State v. DeCamp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-03· cited 60×
• DeAngelo v. Schiedler
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-06-21· cited 55×
• State v. Riley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-22· cited 15×
• State v. Horsley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-06-28· cited 14×
• State v. French
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-11· cited 10×
• State v. Blake
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-11-26· cited 9×
• State v. Gibson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-24· cited 9×
• State v. Isom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-09-28· cited 7×
• State v. Kennedy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-29· cited 2×