State v. Blake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering sentences to be served consecutively, rather than concurrently, is a substantive change
• ordering sentences to be served consecutively rather than concurrently is substantive modification
• “A modification of the judgment providing that the sentences would be served consecutively, rather than concurrently, would be a substantive change in the sen- tence. Such a change must be accomplished in defendant’s presence or it may be invalidated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. DeCamp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-03· cited 60×
• State v. French
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-11· cited 10×
• Ramahi v. Hobart Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-08-04· cited 7×
• State v. Rickard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-28· cited 7×
• State v. Kliment
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-03-24· cited 6×
• State v. Lebeck
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-27· cited 5×
• State v. Gatzke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-18· cited 2×
• State v. Kennedy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-29· cited 2×