State v. Isom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 30-year dangerous offender sentence constitutes an “upward departure”
• “[A] correct sentence for a dangerous offender contains both a determinate mandatory minimum term of incarceration and an indeterminate maximum term, not to exceed 30 years.”
• potential error in second sentencing “demonstrates that defendant could have made a relevant allocution”
• ORS 138.222(5) requires appellate court to remand entire case for resentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rickard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-28· cited 7×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-03-27· cited 6×
• State v. Claborn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-29
• State v. Stephens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• State v. Dilts
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-12-16· cited 77×
• State v. Gornick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-08· cited 62×
• DeAngelo v. Schiedler
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-06-21· cited 55×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 55×
• State v. Coburn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-03-05· cited 9×