State v. Juarez-Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because defendant did not in any way indicate to the court that he wished to speak, nor does he now argue that the right cannot be exercised by counsel, the court did not deny him the right of allocution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zyst v. Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-12· cited 9×
• State v. Bishop
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-14· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Vanornum
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-27· cited 546×
• State v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
• State v. Fern
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 10×
• State v. Rickard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-28· cited 7×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-03-27· cited 6×
• State v. Juarez-Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-27· cited 2×