State v. Schmitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting jury was instructed to answer special interrogatory if it found defendant guilty of pattern harassment
• applying Zupetz and holding that, because domestic abuse murder is founded on general intent, not specific intent, a defendant cannot be prosecuted for attempted domestic abuse murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Steen
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-08-18· cited 22×
• United States v. Victor Hernandez-Montes
  Fifth Circuit· 2016-07-25· cited 21×
• State v. Bjergum
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-08-25· cited 13×
• State v. Noble
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-10-21· cited 9×
• State v. Bird
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-07-12· cited 8×
• State v. Richardson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-10-02· cited 6×
• State v. Stevenson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-01-08· cited 5×
• State v. Ascheman
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-01-12· cited 2×
• State of Minnesota v. Lisa Dawn Oliver
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-08-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Sorenson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-06-02· cited 88×
• State v. Merrill
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-07-29· cited 61×
• State v. Hale
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1992-08-03· cited 58×
• State v. Malaski
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-02-25· cited 58×
• State v. Zupetz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-13· cited 30×
• State v. Grube
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-05-12· cited 28×
• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-10-20· cited 25×
• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-02-14· cited 18×
• State v. Robinson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-12-23· cited 8×