Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 3/2/1999
State v. Edwards
Citations
- 589 N.W.2d 807
- 1999 Minn. App. LEXIS 199
- 1999 WL 107816
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dwelling had not lost its residential character for purposes of burglary statute because the sole occupant had recently died
- affirming a conviction for burglarizing an apartment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harten, Huspeni, Holtan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. MinjarezSupreme Court of Colorado· 2003-12-15· cited 915×
- People v. BarneyNew York Court of Appeals· 2003-02-20· cited 47×
- People v. BarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-05-03· cited 10×
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-10-02· cited 6×
- Cochran v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2003-09-18· cited 6×
- State v. NetlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-12-11· cited 5×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-11-18· cited 4×
- David Kroona v. Frank Dunbar, Padun GV, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-08-17· cited 4×
- People v. VangCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-07-11· cited 4×
- State v. BeaneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-12-30· cited 3×
- State v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-12-26· cited 2×
- Houston v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2002-12-06· cited 2×
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-04-24· cited 2×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,070×
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-03-16· cited 131×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-01-15· cited 58×
- State v. ThaggardSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-01-20· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. McHughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-03-13· cited 45×
- State v. WiernaszSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-27· cited 43×
- Homart Development Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-11-03· cited 29×
- Heaslip v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-01-11· cited 28×
- State v. DiedrichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-08-04· cited 19×
- State v. CiurleoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-06-18· cited 18×
- State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-11-05· cited 14×
- People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-01-27· cited 10×
- State v. KowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-05-10· cited 8×
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-08-06· cited 7×
- State v. ShoreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-02-12· cited 6×
- State v. CashCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-08-05· cited 4×
- State v. MalikSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-09-19· cited 2×
- State v. VoigtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-06-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.