Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/7/2015
State v. Gibson
Citations
- 268 Or. App. 428
- 342 P.3d 168
- 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 35
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the additional fact that the driver of the stolen vehicle could not produce the vehicle’s registration or insurance information established probable cause
- holding that the additional fact that the driver of the stolen vehicle could not produce the vehicle’s registration or insurance information established probable cause
- noting that the person using the vehicle “must know that he or she does not have the owner’s con- sent” to do so
- stating, in a case where the defendant argued that police did not have probable cause to arrest for UUV, that, under ORS 164.135(1), the defendant “must know that he or she does not have the owner’s consent”
- under ORS 164.135, the person using the vehicle “must know that he or she does not have the owner’s consent” to do so
- con- cluding that the driver’s inability to produce registration or insurance for the vehicle was the additional conduct on which “the police could reasonably rely” to establish prob- able cause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Garrett, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-17· cited 14×
- State v. Huerta-ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-20· cited 10×
- State v. PeirceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-03· cited 9×
- State v. ConnellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-19· cited 9×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-06· cited 5×
- State v. SimonovCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 3×
- State v. McCallCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-11-03· cited 3×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-16· cited 2×
- State v. LipkaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-01· cited 2×
- State v. MendellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-06-26
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RatliffOregon Supreme Court· 1987-10-20· cited 56×
- State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-03-31· cited 37×
- State v. DanielsOregon Supreme Court· 2010-10-07· cited 18×
- State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-19· cited 15×
- State v. RayburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-09· cited 12×
- State v. HebrardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-03· cited 9×
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-04· cited 8×
- State v. AyvazovCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-23· cited 6×
- State v. MacECourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-04-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.