Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/15/1999
Reynolds v. State
Citations
- 4 S.W.3d 13
- 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 101
- 1999 WL 722254
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that Tarver was decided \as a matter of federal constitutional law\ pursuant to double jeopardy principles and applied \federal constitutional collateral estoppel principles under Ashe \
- noting that the same party in the collateral-estoppel context connotes someone who had the power to control the course of the previous litigation
- noting that the same party in the collateral-estoppel context connotes someone who had the power to control the course of the previous litigation
- noting that the same party in the collateral-estoppel context connotes someone who had the power to control the course of the previous litigation
- noting that the same party in the collateral-estoppel context connotes someone who had the power to control the course of the previous litigation
- discussing the constitutional limits of this doctrine on the power of state legislatures to legislate in this area
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCormick, Mansfield, Keller, Holland, Womack, Keasler, Meyers, Johnson, Price
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-03-13· cited 942×
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-01-05· cited 641×
- State Ex Rel. Rosenthal v. PoeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-02-12· cited 262×
- Ex Parte TuleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-07-02· cited 229×
- York v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-06-29· cited 156×
- Ex Parte WatkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-04-03· cited 133×
- Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-11-06· cited 109×
- Guajardo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-07-02· cited 104×
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-11-07· cited 69×
- Doan, Ex Parte DustinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-06-20· cited 69×
- Davy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2001-12-28· cited 56×
- Vrba v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2002-01-30· cited 53×
- Hess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2007-04-19· cited 38×
- Miles v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-06-16· cited 38×
- State v. LemmerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-09· cited 32×
- State v. RodriguezTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1999-12-16· cited 31×
- Cook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-16· cited 30×
- State v. HenryTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2000-05-17· cited 30×
- Grant v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-11-30· cited 29×
- State v. WatersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-10-31· cited 28×
Cites
73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,956×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 2,492×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,410×
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court· 1973-02-27· cited 1,368×
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,352×
- Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-16· cited 1,256×
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1938-03-07· cited 1,233×
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court· 1975-05-27· cited 1,196×
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-03-03· cited 1,194×
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 967×
- Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 659×
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-12-11· cited 544×
- State v. TerrazasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-09-15· cited 424×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.