Oregon Supreme Court· 3/22/1988

State v. Donovan

Citations

751 P.2d 1109
305 Or. 332
1988 Ore. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that a probation revocation hear- ing “is not easily categorized as either criminal or civil” and explaining that the burden of proof is the lower standard used in civil cases
noting that the state must prove that a defendant violated a condition of probation by a preponderance of the evidence
noting that a “probation revocation proceeding invokes the criminal sanctions pending against the defendant” to justify extend- ing the exclusionary rule to juvenile probation revocation
noting that a “probation revocation proceeding invokes the crim- inal sanctions pending against the defendant” to justify extending the exclusionary rule to juvenile probation revo- cation
considering the circumstances of the hearing in question in determining whether decisions in probation revocation hearings can be preclusive in later criminal trials
“If the court elects to conduct a probation revocation hearing on specific violations, the court should make specific findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.