Barackman v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that binding arbitration did not deprive the plaintiff, who voluntarily chose to arbitrate, of her right to a jury trial
• holding litigant had not shown “that the forum somehow prevented her from offering the proof that she needed to show to prevail”
• reaffirming Shuler that claim preclusion undoubtedly applies in arbitration proceedings and that application does not violate a plaintiff’s right to a jury trial
• reaffirming Shuler that claim preclusion undoubtedly applies in arbitration proceedings and that application does not violate a plaintiff’s right to a jury trial
• “We note that, in general, arbitration proceedings have been accorded preclusive effect in subsequent civil actions for decades.”
• “Constitutional rights may be waived, however, and the right to a jury trial is one of those rights that may be waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).