State v. Randle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “an officer is not constitutionally required to choose between a consensual encounter in the dark or turning on a spotlight and thereby effectuating a detention that may not be supported by reasonable suspicion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cox
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2020-01-16· cited 2×
• State of Iowa v. Kari Lee Fogg
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2019-12-20

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Florida v. Royer
  Supreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
• United States v. Mendenhall
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
• Florida v. Bostick
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
• State v. Atkinson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1996-04-10· cited 759×
• State v. Valdez-Molina
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 700×
• State v. Schevers
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1999-02-09· cited 680×
• State v. Fodge
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1992-01-16· cited 375×
• State v. Bishop
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 158×
• State v. Fry
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-10-08· cited 79×
• State v. Jordan
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1992-09-28· cited 62×
• State v. Willoughby
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-05-12· cited 42×
• State v. Zubizareta
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1992-09-14· cited 40×
• State v. Baker
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2004-12-22· cited 35×
• State v. Jestice
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2004-08-18· cited 34×
• State v. McAfee
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1989-12-05· cited 33×
• State v. Schmidt
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2002-05-14· cited 32×
• State v. Adams
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2003-03-24· cited 9×