Idaho Court of Appeals· 10/8/1991
State v. Fry
Citations
- 831 P.2d 942
- 122 Idaho 100
- 1991 Ida. App. LEXIS 208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that unless the officer conveys a message that compliance is required, the encounter is deemed consensual
- explaining that officers may generally ask individuals questions and ask to examine identification
- seizure occurred when one officer stood behind vehicle blocking exit while another officer knocked on the driver’s window and began questioning driver
- “[the officer] asked Fry what he was doing____ Unlike other cases in which the police request the subject’s cooperation in answering questions, the inquiry here as to what Fry was doing did not give Fry the option of answering or not.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walters, Silak, Fuller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals· 1999-11-15· cited 240×
- State v. GutierrezIdaho Court of Appeals· 2002-07-10· cited 92×
- Commonwealth v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-05-02· cited 64×
- State v. JordanIdaho Court of Appeals· 1992-09-28· cited 62×
- State v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-12-07· cited 53×
- State v. ZubizaretaIdaho Court of Appeals· 1992-09-14· cited 40×
- State v. SchmidtIdaho Court of Appeals· 2002-05-14· cited 32×
- State v. StewartIdaho Court of Appeals· 2008-03-28· cited 30×
- State v. SevyIdaho Court of Appeals· 1997-01-21· cited 27×
- State v. SilvaIdaho Court of Appeals· 2000-08-08· cited 26×
- State v. BrumfieldIdaho Court of Appeals· 2001-12-18· cited 25×
- State v. MaddoxIdaho Court of Appeals· 2002-06-13· cited 23×
- State v. BarrettIdaho Court of Appeals· 2003-01-07· cited 18×
- State v. WaldieIdaho Court of Appeals· 1995-03-10· cited 17×
- State v. ZunigaIdaho Court of Appeals· 2006-10-17· cited 14×
- State v. LinenbergerIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-09-01· cited 12×
- State v. RandleIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-02-06· cited 11×
- State v. GriggIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-04-01· cited 11×
- State v. MantheiIdaho Supreme Court· 1997-04-09· cited 11×
- State v. KeeneIdaho Court of Appeals· 2007-08-16· cited 9×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,950×
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
- Florida v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1984-11-13· cited 466×
- State v. JohnsIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-04-29· cited 100×
- United States v. William Raymond RoseSixth Circuit· 1989-11-20· cited 78×
- Matter of ClaytonIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-01-07· cited 60×
- Matter of McNeelyIdaho Court of Appeals· 1990-07-24· cited 48×
- State v. McAfeeIdaho Court of Appeals· 1989-12-05· cited 33×
- State v. ZappIdaho Court of Appeals· 1985-06-04· cited 26×
- Mason v. State, Dept. of Law EnforcementIdaho Court of Appeals· 1982-10-19· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.