Supreme Court of Iowa· 10/23/1996

State v. Randle

Citations

555 N.W.2d 666
1996 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 424
1996 WL 609581

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

analyzing the particularity requirement simultaneously under the Fourth Amendment, article I, section 8 of the Iowa Constitution, and Iowa Code section 808.3
noting magistrate set forth facts showing informant’s “track record” of reliability
noting defendant had items associated with drug sales, including a digital scale
“When there is an ‘isolated violation [of the law],’ ‘probable cause quickly dwindles with the passage of time.’ ”
“Allegations of criminal conduct may be so distant in time as to. provide no probable cause for a warrant.”
“Because the confidential informant was not a citizen informant, the informant was not entitled to a presumption of reliability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Carter, Lavorato, Snell, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Randle

35 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.