· 1/16/1992
State v. Fodge
Citations
- 824 P.2d 123
- 121 Idaho 192
- 1992 Ida. LEXIS 9
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that generally, issues not raised below may not be considered for the first time on appeal
- concluding that generally, issues not raised below may not be considered for the first time on appeal
- holding that defendant failed to preserve consideration of whether it was error for trial court to not require that an interpreter take an oath because defendant failed to object
- holding that DeRushé v. State, 146 Idaho 599, 200 P.3d 1148 (2009
- holding that DeRushé v. State, 146 Idaho 599, 200 P.3d 1148 (2009
- holding issues not raised below may not be considered for the first time on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McDevitt, Bakes, Bistline, Johnson, Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.