Skip to main content
· 1/16/1992

State v. Fodge

Citations

  • 824 P.2d 123
  • 121 Idaho 192
  • 1992 Ida. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that generally, issues not raised below may not be considered for the first time on appeal
  • concluding that generally, issues not raised below may not be considered for the first time on appeal
  • holding that defendant failed to preserve consideration of whether it was error for trial court to not require that an interpreter take an oath because defendant failed to object
  • holding that DeRushé v. State, 146 Idaho 599, 200 P.3d 1148 (2009
  • holding that DeRushé v. State, 146 Idaho 599, 200 P.3d 1148 (2009
  • holding issues not raised below may not be considered for the first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDevitt, Bakes, Bistline, Johnson, Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.