Arizona Supreme Court· 7/21/1977
State v. Ramirez
Citations
- 569 P.2d 201
- 116 Ariz. 259
- 1977 Ariz. LEXIS 355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding admission of victim's hearsay statement did not require reversal, in part, because the court instructed the jury to disregard the statement
- concluding admission of victim’s hearsay statement did not require reversal, in part, because the court instructed the jury to disregard the statement
- finding no error when the record as a whole supported the trial court’s finding that defendant’s waiver of Miranda rights was knowing and voluntary
- error to disclose to prosecutor “certain statements of the appellant’s in [the psychiatrist’s] report which should have been excised”
- error for physician to testify as to statements made by defendant during examination
- four and a half hours sufficient to show cool state of mind
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Gordon, Hays, Holohan, Struckmeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 217×
- State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-14· cited 207×
- State v. AdamsonArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-11· cited 201×
- State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court· 1980-07-25· cited 189×
- Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-10-07· cited 183×
- State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-30· cited 129×
- State v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court· 1981-04-14· cited 126×
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 115×
- State v. Martinez-VillarealArizona Supreme Court· 1985-07-10· cited 98×
- State of Az v. Christopher George Theodore LamarArizona Supreme Court· 2003-07-17· cited 77×
- State v. KochArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-06· cited 60×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1979-07-13· cited 55×
- State v. AlgerIdaho Supreme Court· 1979-12-06· cited 51×
- State v. BargerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-10-25· cited 42×
- State v. BaileyArizona Supreme Court· 1989-04-13· cited 41×
- State v. MoralesArizona Supreme Court· 1978-10-30· cited 31×
- State v. BradleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-11-09· cited 31×
- State v. TurrentineCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-05-15· cited 30×
- State v. DiazArizona Supreme Court· 2010-02-12· cited 27×
- State v. EdwardsArizona Supreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 27×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-30· cited 227×
- People v. AtchleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-12-01· cited 166×
- People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-05-25· cited 156×
- Sullivan v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1936-03-02· cited 92×
- Bartram v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-10-05· cited 54×
- Couch v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court· 1972-01-10· cited 50×
- State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court· 1972-04-07· cited 46×
- Gaunt v. BrownSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 38×
- State v. DixonArizona Supreme Court· 1971-10-05· cited 37×
- State v. DukeArizona Supreme Court· 1974-01-31· cited 35×
- State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court· 1975-12-19· cited 34×
- State v. MumbaughArizona Supreme Court· 1971-12-09· cited 31×
- State v. GauseArizona Supreme Court· 1971-10-19· cited 29×
- State v. CejaArizona Supreme Court· 1976-02-11· cited 29×
- State v. EvansArizona Supreme Court· 1969-05-28· cited 27×
- State v. DruryArizona Supreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 27×
- State v. WhitakerArizona Supreme Court· 1975-12-22· cited 25×
- State v. IzzoArizona Supreme Court· 1963-06-27· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.