Arizona Supreme Court· 3/25/1974
State v. Drury
Citations
- 520 P.2d 495
- 110 Ariz. 447
- 1974 Ariz. LEXIS 291
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the anti-marital fact privilege “operates to absolutely disqualify a spouse as a witness for or against the other without his or her consent”
- stating that the marital communications privilege poses \an obstacle to the pursuit of truth\ and \it should be limited rather than expanded\
- recognizing ex parte divorce decree
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Hays, Struckmeyer, Lockwood, Holohan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-08-29· cited 110×
- Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-06-08· cited 67×
- State v. RamirezArizona Supreme Court· 1977-07-21· cited 56×
- State v. HarrodArizona Supreme Court· 2001-07-16· cited 53×
- State v. CarrilloArizona Supreme Court· 1988-02-02· cited 50×
- State v. HallArizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-21· cited 47×
- Gretzler v. StewartNinth Circuit· 1997-04-30· cited 45×
- State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court· 1975-12-19· cited 34×
- State v. MoralesArizona Supreme Court· 1978-10-30· cited 31×
- State v. DecelloArizona Supreme Court· 1974-09-17· cited 26×
- State v. WhitakerArizona Supreme Court· 1975-12-22· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. McBurrowsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-06-01· cited 21×
- State v. O'DONNALArizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-24· cited 17×
- Schilz v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CTY.Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-02-07· cited 14×
- State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court· 1974-05-15· cited 14×
- Oyakawa v. GillettCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-06-10· cited 14×
- State v. HartSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-07-24· cited 9×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1997-04-30· cited 1×
- In re MH 2007-000937Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-05-06· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca AllenArizona Supreme Court· 2022-07-26· cited 1×
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Haley v. OhioSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,069×
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1945-05-21· cited 1,048×
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 1,003×
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 986×
- Payne v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 840×
- Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 759×
- Ashcraft v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1944-05-01· cited 693×
- Reck v. PateSupreme Court· 1961-06-12· cited 543×
- Fikes v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1957-01-14· cited 507×
- Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 488×
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court· 1935-03-11· cited 378×
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court· 1935-12-09· cited 351×
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court· 1938-11-07· cited 299×
- Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court· 1951-03-12· cited 264×
- Coe v. CoeSupreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 222×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.