Arizona Supreme Court· 4/13/1989

State v. Bailey

Citations

772 P.2d 1130
160 Ariz. 277
33 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
1989 Ariz. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a remark that the defendant had been in jail did not require a mistrial because “[e]ven if the members of the jury reached that conclusion, they would have no idea how much time he spent in prison or for what crime”
determining the codefendant’s “rambling answer suggest[ing] that [the] defendant had served time in prison” was inadmissible but “fairly innocuous,” given its vague nature, and therefore did not warrant a mistrial
discussing the supreme court's requirement that a prima facie case be shown
potential juror was previously convicted of misdemeanor assault, was indicted for burglary, and requested to be excused
prima facie case under Batson established where prosecutor used peremptory to strike only black person on the panel
racial make-up of final jury panel important consideration in establishing defendant’s prima facie showing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moeller, Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Corcoran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.