New Mexico Court of Appeals· 7/5/1983

State v. Rael

Citations

668 P.2d 309
100 N.M. 193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing that a motion to 9 amend the docketing statement must show that the issue counsel seeks to add was 10 properly preserved below
noting that we will grant a motion to 3 1 amend where, among other factors, the motion explains how the issue was preserved
stating that in 12 cases assigned to the summary calendar, this Court will grant a motion to amend the 13 docketing statement to include additional issues if the motion (1) is timely, (2
setting out 5 requirements for a motion to amend the docketing statement to add additional claims 6 of error
setting out requirements for 8 accepting a motion to amend the docketing statement
setting forth the criteria that must be satisfied 17 before this Court will grant a motion to amend the docketing statement, one of which 18 is an explanation of how the issue was properly preserved or why it may be raised for 19 the first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walters, Donnelly, Bivins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Rael

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.