New Mexico Supreme Court· 9/6/1978
State v. Doe
Citations
- 583 P.2d 464
- 92 N.M. 100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that if the defendant’s words and actions did not constitute the offense of disorderly conduct, then his conviction was fundamental error
- stating that officer acting in good faith remains in lawful discharge of his duties, whether the officer’s actions are lawful or unlawful
- reversing the defendant’s disorderly conduct conviction where he argued with police officers during traffic stop but was not combative and “no act of violence was attempted”
- private citizen cannot use force to resist a search by authorized police officers even if arrest is illegal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McManus, Sosa, Easley, Payne, Federici
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fogarty v. GallegosTenth Circuit· 2008-04-18· cited 788×
- State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-08-29· cited 331×
- State v. SalasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-05-18· cited 299×
- State v. RaelNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-07-05· cited 223×
- State v. BishopIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 158×
- Buck v. City of AlbuquerqueTenth Circuit· 2008-12-09· cited 153×
- State v. ChamberlainNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-09-25· cited 135×
- Elson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1983-02-18· cited 75×
- State v. WiegmannCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-08-04· cited 73×
- State v. ValentineWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-01· cited 72×
- Commonwealth v. MoreiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-03-29· cited 60×
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-06-10· cited 54×
- State v. ComitzNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2019-05-23· cited 53×
- State v. GardinerUtah Supreme Court· 1991-06-18· cited 45×
- State v. James M.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-12-13· cited 44×
- State v. HobsonWisconsin Supreme Court· 1998-05-27· cited 34×
- State v. McAdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-07-24· cited 31×
- State v. TraneUtah Supreme Court· 2002-09-17· cited 30×
- State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2016-09-19· cited 30×
- State v. WadeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-07-12· cited 29×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-03-23· cited 1,905×
- United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. SmithSecond Circuit· 1967-02-23· cited 130×
- Norwell v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 92×
- State v. HattonArizona Supreme Court· 1977-07-06· cited 85×
- United States v. Augustine FerroneThird Circuit· 1971-02-17· cited 84×
- United States v. Nestor MartinezSecond Circuit· 1972-08-23· cited 42×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1967-12-01· cited 35×
- State v. FrazierNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-06-11· cited 27×
- State v. SedilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1969-10-31· cited 22×
- State v. FlorstedtNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-10-10· cited 21×
- State v. OdenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-04-23· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.