New Mexico Court of Appeals· 12/6/1988
State v. Hughes
Citations
- 767 P.2d 382
- 108 N.M. 143
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “federal cases interpreting RICO provide valuable guidance to New Mexico courts interpreting our [Racketeering] Act”
- New Mexico Racketeering Act is similar to RICO, and federal cases provide valuable guidance
- “It is clear that an 10 owner of personal property may testify concerning the value of the property and that 11 such testimony is sufficient to support a jury’s determination of value.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Apodaca, Fruman, Minzner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-08-30· cited 297×
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-20· cited 87×
- State v. BallNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-08-06· cited 62×
- State v. BarrNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-05-17· cited 61×
- Naranjo v. PaullNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-10-04· cited 46×
- State v. RaelNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-04-06· cited 39×
- State v. HoeffelNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-06-04· cited 28×
- State v. HaarNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-06-26· cited 26×
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-09-17· cited 23×
- State v. CobreraNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-04-08· cited 17×
- State v. LozaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2018-08-23· cited 13×
- Bayer v. BayerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-09-14· cited 10×
- State v. ArchuletaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-11-07· cited 8×
- State v. CattNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2018-11-13· cited 7×
- State v. ArchuletaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-12-16· cited 1×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 1,092×
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherNinth Circuit· 1981-12-21· cited 277×
- United States v. RiccobeneThird Circuit· 1983-05-20· cited 238×
- United States v. BledsoeEighth Circuit· 1982-03-12· cited 236×
- State v. RaelNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-07-05· cited 223×
- United States v. NeapolitanSeventh Circuit· 1986-05-16· cited 207×
- United States v. Harry Aleman and Leonard ForestaSeventh Circuit· 1979-10-30· cited 188×
- Superior Oil Co. v. FulmerEighth Circuit· 1986-03-05· cited 183×
- Dix v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1980-03-24· cited 164×
- Habib v. Raytheon Co.Supreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 161×
- United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. FletcherD.C. Circuit· 1988-03-08· cited 137×
- United States v. Leslie Anderson and Leonard MooneyEighth Circuit· 1980-09-12· cited 130×
- State v. LankfordNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-07-25· cited 111×
- United States v. Sam Cagnina, A/K/A \Sam\, \Fat Man\, \Charles Lawton\Eleventh Circuit· 1983-02-10· cited 110×
- United States v. Paul MazzeiSecond Circuit· 1983-05-23· cited 93×
- United States v. Sam Qaoud Evan H. Callanan, Sr. Evan H. Callanan, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 1985-11-21· cited 83×
- United Energy Owners Committee, Inc., and Robert T. Gilleran v. United States Energy Management Systems, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1988-03-10· cited 78×
- United States v. Robert Griffin, United States of America v. Benjamin Garonzik, United States of America v. Stanley DiamondFourth Circuit· 1982-01-11· cited 68×
- United States v. Carroll Zane Tillett, A/K/A Frog, A/K/A Greenie, United States of America v. Michael Dale RogersFourth Circuit· 1985-06-05· cited 68×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.