State v. Anaya

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• facts in docketing statement which are not challenged are to be accepted as the facts of the case; where facts of a case are clear, only questions of law remain to be determined by an appellate court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sutphin
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-05-02· cited 538×
• State v. Trujillo
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-02-05· cited 229×
• State v. Rael
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-07-05· cited 223×
• Eddie Maes v. John Thomas, Warden and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-01-23· cited 174×
• State v. Gattis
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-11-26· cited 43×
• State v. Neatherlin
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-02-09· cited 39×
• Perez v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 36×
• Varos v. Union Oil Co. of California
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-09-11· cited 35×
• State v. Sheldon
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-03-27· cited 35×
• Garrison Ex Rel. Estate of Garrison v. Safeway Stores
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-11-08· cited 29×
• Udall v. Townsend
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-10-01· cited 29×
• State v. Jensen
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-09-25· cited 15×
• Garcia-Lopez v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-08-09· cited 9×
• State v. Billington
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-10-21· cited 8×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Calanche
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-01-10· cited 63×
• Edens v. New Mexico Health & Social Services Department
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-03-16· cited 55×
• State v. Pohl
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-09-14· cited 23×
• State v. Seaton
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-08-23· cited 19×
• State v. Till
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-06-26· cited 13×
• Anderson v. Tiemann
  Supreme Court· 1968-04-22· cited 11×