Skip to main content

State v. James

Citations

  • 784 P.2d 1021
  • 109 N.M. 278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the defendant’s conviction for embezzlement and 6 observing that “[t]he fact that the evidence is circumstantial makes no difference”
  • when trial court’s statement of its reasons for increasing defendant’s basic sentence did not allow appellate court to determine whether decision rested on permissible basis, remand for resentencing was required
  • followed Grayson but remanded case ordering findings on record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chavez, Donnelly, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.