State v. Ramming

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that New Mexico cases relating to communications with the jury during deliberations and involving matters concerning the deliberations “obviously reflect the sacrosanctity of the jury’s deliberative process”
• stating thatNew Mexico cases relating to communications with the jury during deliberations and involving matters concerning the deliberations “obviously reflect the sacrosanctity of the jury’s deliberative process”
• no severance required when contested testimony implicated codefendant but did not point unerringly to defendant’s guilt or have a devastating impact on his defense
• “[T]he standard of review applicable to a severance issue is exceedingly narrow.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).