Arizona Supreme Court· 8/26/2003

State v. Prince

Citations

75 P.3d 114
206 Ariz. 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the “reasonableness of the positions” provision “is separate from the ‘financial resources’ provision, and an applicant need not show both . . . in order to qualify for consideration for an award”
finding no prejudice resulting from denial of severance motion where jury is instructed to consider each offense separately and advised that each must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt
where evidence of age aggravator uncontroverted, error in not having jury make finding harmless
sentencing issues may become moot when sentence is vacated
sentencing issues may become moot when sentence is vacated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGregor, Jones, Berch, Ryan, Hurwitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.