State v. Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• confrontation rights afford only a “full and fair opportunity to probe and expose infirmities” in witnesses’ testimony “through cross-examination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn Hausner
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2012-07-10· cited 89×
• State v. Ortega
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-10-14· cited 43×
• People v. Bryant
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-17· cited 39×
• State v. Joe
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-01-21· cited 7×
• State of Arizona v. Luis Enrique Ortega
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-10-14

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• California v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
• Delaware v. Fensterer
  Supreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 1,786×
• State v. Henderson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 1,009×
• United States v. Owens
  Supreme Court· 1988-02-23· cited 997×
• State v. Robinson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-04-07· cited 253×
• State v. Moran
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-11-19· cited 189×
• State v. Valencia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-05-02· cited 165×
• State v. King
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1994-11-03· cited 136×
• State v. Glassel
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2005-08-10· cited 129×
• State v. Robinson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-06-26· cited 75×
• State v. Price
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-11-16· cited 61×
• People v. Sharp
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-03-02· cited 49×
• State v. Moran
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-09-18· cited 10×