State v. Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he record clearly shows that [the] [defendant had the opportunity to effectively cross-examine [the seven year old] [v]ictim under oath and call to the attention of the jury [the] [v]ictim’s forgetfulness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Norris
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-11-19· cited 15×
• State v. Myers
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-01-15· cited 12×
• State v. McFarland
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-08-14· cited 6×
• Guese v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-01-24· cited 2×
• State v. Williams
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-06-18· cited 1×
• STATE OF MISSOURI v. TIMOTHY M. KLEESCHULTE
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2021-02-19
• STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. LUTHER JOHN CHRISTIANSON, JR.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2022-04-05

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• California v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
• Delaware v. Fensterer
  Supreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 1,786×
• United States v. Owens
  Supreme Court· 1988-02-23· cited 997×
• State v. Schaal
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1991-04-09· cited 122×
• City of Spokane v. Spokane County
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-11-16· cited 104×
• State v. Justus
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2006-11-21· cited 86×
• State v. Price
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-11-16· cited 61×
• State v. Carothers
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-11-15· cited 29×