Skip to main content

State v. Walker

Citations

  • 118 P.3d 935
  • 129 Wash. App. 258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that suspect’s repeated statements that he did not want to incriminate himself, while continuing to speak with detectives for many hours, did not constitute an unequivocal invocation of his right to remain silent
  • holding victim's statement testimonial where it was \elicited in response to structured police questioning pursuant to a police investigation\
  • holding victim’s statement testimonial where it was “elicited in response to structured police questioning pursuant to a police investigation”
  • finding testimonial any statement \elicited in response to structured police questioning in the course of a police investigation\
  • finding testimonial any statement “elicited in response to structured police questioning in the course of a police investigation”
  • holding the defendant did not invoke his right to remain silent where he “did not tell the police that he wished to remain silent, but instead said that he did not want to say anything that would make him look guilty or incriminate him,” and then continued to talk with officers further

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grosse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.