Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/29/2005
State v. Walker
Citations
- 118 P.3d 935
- 129 Wash. App. 258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that suspect’s repeated statements that he did not want to incriminate himself, while continuing to speak with detectives for many hours, did not constitute an unequivocal invocation of his right to remain silent
- holding victim's statement testimonial where it was \elicited in response to structured police questioning pursuant to a police investigation\
- holding victim’s statement testimonial where it was “elicited in response to structured police questioning pursuant to a police investigation”
- finding testimonial any statement \elicited in response to structured police questioning in the course of a police investigation\
- finding testimonial any statement “elicited in response to structured police questioning in the course of a police investigation”
- holding the defendant did not invoke his right to remain silent where he “did not tell the police that he wished to remain silent, but instead said that he did not want to say anything that would make him look guilty or incriminate him,” and then continued to talk with officers further
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grosse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 290×
- In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court· 2014-06-26· cited 211×
- State v. MizenkoMontana Supreme Court· 2006-01-11· cited 72×
- DeWeaver v. RunnelsNinth Circuit· 2009-02-25· cited 66×
- State v. RadcliffeWashington Supreme Court· 2008-10-23· cited 60×
- State v. ShaferWashington Supreme Court· 2006-02-09· cited 53×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-02-06· cited 50×
- State v. PiatnitskyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-08-20· cited 16×
- State v. BudaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-12-20· cited 12×
- People v. LearnAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-03-02· cited 11×
- State v. RadcliffeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-06-12· cited 9×
- State v. OhlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-28· cited 7×
- Majority OpinionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-26
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 2,639×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.Supreme Court· 2004-06-21· cited 884×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 271×
- Ira Nash, Jr. v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentFifth Circuit· 1979-06-21· cited 204×
- State v. AtenWashington Supreme Court· 1996-11-27· cited 189×
- State v. RobtoyWashington Supreme Court· 1982-11-10· cited 161×
- Larry Thompson v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender RehabilitationFifth Circuit· 1979-10-02· cited 150×
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2005-05-12· cited 114×
- United States v. Douglas Merrill NielsenNinth Circuit· 2004-06-09· cited 107×
- State v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-10-06· cited 60×
- State v. PortnoyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-04-15· cited 41×
- State v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-16· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.