Skip to main content

State v. Miller

Citations

  • 287 Or. App. 135
  • 401 P.3d 229
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that hear- say evidence that is a recorded recollection has “indicia of reliability” that make it admissible
  • discussing “whether the trial court as factfinder conducted a separate and distinct analysis of the evidence” to determine whether erroneous joinder was harmless
  • distinguishing the making of a “statement” from the making of a “record” and holding that OEC 803(5) requires, at a minimum, that the person making the statement be aware that the statement is being recorded
  • a declarant must both know that their statement is being recorded and “act with the intention to bring about the exis- tence of [a] record” to have “made” a record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Hadlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.