State v. Stalder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sentence is both unlawfully excessive and unlawfully indeterminate if the term of incarceration and term of PPS taken together are greater than the statutory maximum, regardless of whether the court inserts a qualification
• the rule requires that “a judgment of conviction state a definite sentence”
• vacating an unlawfully excessive and unlawfully indeterminate sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-15· cited 30×
• United States v. Ronald Lester Parry
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-03-14· cited 28×
• State v. Mitchell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-14· cited 15×
• State v. Kuester
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-09· cited 5×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-02· cited 4×
• State v. Larrance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-04-15· cited 4×
• State v. Powell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 3×
• State v. Burt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-01· cited 1×
• State v. Chavez-Reyes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-18· cited 1×
• United States v. Parry
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-03-13