State v. Poitra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining plain error review of unpreserved Crawford objection where the state had ample evidence of the defendant’s guilt over and above the disputed evidence
• “If the disputed testimony is merely cumulative of other evidence that already established the same fact, then the error is harmless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-15· cited 30×
• State v. Sewell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-10· cited 24×
• State v. Hobbs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-27· cited 9×
• State v. McCool
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-02· cited 2×
• State v. Szoke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-02· cited 1×