State v. Pierce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a law office functioned as an “enterprise” separate from the criminal acts committed by its member
• standard of review on denial of judgment of acquittal
• setting out standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Deford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 22×
• State v. G. L. D.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 20×
• State v. Schwartz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-04-04· cited 15×
• State v. Courtier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-04-12· cited 7×
• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-29· cited 2×
• State v. Patton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-23· cited 2×
• State v. Waterhouse
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. King
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 170×
• Computer Concepts, Inc. v. Brandt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 38×
• State v. Callaghan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-03-01· cited 27×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Griffith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-30· cited 16×
• Penuel v. Titan/Value Equities Group, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-03-30· cited 10×
• State v. Cheek
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-02-14· cited 8×
• State v. Wiemals
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-03-16· cited 1×