Skip to main content
· 12/30/1987

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Griffith

Citations

  • 748 P.2d 86
  • 304 Or. 575
  • 1987 Ore. LEXIS 2096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disbarring attorney who participated in sham transaction with his partner to circumvent federal banking laws and misrepresented his net worth to a bank
  • disbarring attorney who participated in sham transaction with his partner to circumvent federal banking laws and misrepresented his net worth to a bank
  • stating that trial panel “makes decisions and not recommendations”
  • applying factor when some of lawyer’s indebtedness had likely been reduced by 16 Respondent asserts in his opening brief that the trial panel hearing was originally set at an earlier time but was delayed when he attempted (unsuccess- fully

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.