Skip to main content
· 4/12/2000

State v. Courtier

Citations

  • 997 P.2d 894
  • 166 Or. App. 514
  • 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ordinance defining “deadly or dangerous weapon” by use of the term “includes” was not limited to those weapons particularly described and identified
  • ordinance defining “dangerous or deadly weapon” by use of term “includes” was not limited to the list of particularly described and identified weapons
  • court, pursuant to PCC 1.01.170, relied upon the definition of “deadly weapon” in ORS 161.015(2) to construe PCC 14.32.100, which proscribes carrying a concealed dangerous or deadly weapon
  • “a motion for judgment of acquittal tests only the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, not the sufficiency of the evidence to satisfy the instructions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Haselton, Linder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.