Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/28/2006

State v. Pennington

Citations

281 Kan. 426
132 P.3d 902
2006 Kan. LEXIS 222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

upholding exclusion of mental disease or defect evidence when defendant did not proffer tire evidence as tending to prove the disease or defect prevented him from forming required mental state
no error to exclude psychologist’s expert testimony proffered in furtherance of theory of defense when evidence irrelevant to mens rea defense
expert testimony irrelevant when it does not tend to demonstrate defendant is unable to form requisite intent or does not support mental disease or defect defense as a matter of law
“crime of aggravated robbery requires proof only of general intent”
mental disease or defect negates intent element of crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, Lockett, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.