Skip to main content

State v. Edwards

Citations

  • 299 Kan. 1008
  • 327 P.3d 469
  • 2014 WL 2916872
  • 2014 Kan. LEXIS 362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \the civil discovery rules of K.S.A. 60-226 relating to expert witnesses do not apply in criminal proceedings.\
  • applying rationale in Harris to conclude that civil discovery rules relating to notice for parties introducing testimony of 34 expert witnesses found in K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 60-226 did not govern criminal proceedings given the comparable counterpart in K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 22-3212
  • applying rationale in Harris to conclude that civil discovery rules relating to notice for parties introducing testimony of expert witnesses found in K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 60-226 did not govern criminal proceedings given the comparable counterpart in K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 22-3212
  • general intent required for aggravated robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, McQuin, Moritz, Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.