State v. Alexander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defense of compulsion was not available to defendant, a habitual violator, where he illegally drove his vehicle after cause of compulsion had passed
• “The exclusion of evidence to support a compulsion defense is not subject to the normal abuse of discretion standard for reviewing a trial court’s evidentiary rulings. Whether the compulsion defense is available to a defendant is a matter of law determined by the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rios
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-03-22· cited 22×
• State v. Pennington
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-04-28· cited 18×
• State v. Harvey
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-02-13· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hunter
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1987-07-17· cited 87×
• State v. Irons
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-02-28· cited 23×
• State v. Pichon
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-05-10· cited 16×
• State v. Riedl
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-03-15· cited 8×
• State v. Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-06-09· cited 4×