Supreme Court of Minnesota· 9/2/2010

State v. Larson

Citations

787 N.W.2d 592
2010 Minn. LEXIS 535
2010 WL 3430860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the defendant’s substantial rights were not affected because there was “considerable evidence” of the defendant’s guilt
holding that defendant’s substantial rights were not affected by allegedly erroneous accomplice liability jury instruction because there was “considerable evidence” of the defendant’s intent that the victim be murdered
concluding that failure to ask jury whether victim’s death was reasonably foreseeable to Larson did not prejudice substantial rights when “considerable evidence” produced at trial that Larson intended victim be murdered
declining to consider whether the district court's use of jury instructions constituted an error that was plain because it concluded any alleged error was harmless
declining to address the defendant's argument that the trial court erred by failing to order the police to authenticate defense-prepared transcripts of the witness interviews because the alleged error was harmless
affirming a conviction on a claim of an erroneous jury instruction when jury would not have reached a different conclusion even if it had been properly instructed and any error did not affect the defendant’s substantial rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gildea, Stras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.